Skip to main content
Log in

A Mixed-Methods Investigation of Diagnostician Sex/Gender-Bias and Challenges in Assessing Females for Autism Spectrum Disorder

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the importance of clinical judgement in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) assessment, little is currently known about challenges faced by diagnosticians when the client is female, any sex/gender biases during the assessment process, and how these issues affect diagnostic outcomes. Forty-seven ASD diagnosticians completed a questionnaire containing two hypothetical case studies (a ‘male’ and ‘female’ ASD presentation), with sex/gender randomly assigned within each. Diagnosticians reported greater ASD symptom severity when female sex/gender pseudonyms were allocated to the case studies, but their confidence in ASD diagnosis was similar regardless of condition. Diagnosticians identified a large number of challenges associated with assessing females for ASD. Many of these related to sex/gender differences in ASD presentation and limitations of diagnostic instruments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Sex refers to biological characteristics differentiating males and females and gender to socially constructed roles and attributes viewed as normative for a particular sex (American Psychiatric Association, 2011). Gendered socialisation begins at birth and resultantly, biological sex and socialised gender are not easily separated, mutually informing an individual’s identity. Therefore, as proposed by Springer et al. (2011) and recommended by Lai et al. (2015), the term sex/gender will be used to reflect the overlap between both constructs (unless otherwise stated).

  2. Supplied as supplementary material.

  3. Only the child’s pseudonym, gendered pronouns and names of friends were altered across conditions. Gender neutral interests were selected.

  4. The precise nature of the regression differed depending on the outcome variable. The probability that a criterion was met (categorical) was modelled using conditional logistic regression with the relevant probabilities estimated from a linear combination of the predictors via a logit link. The remaining dependent variables were numerical and, therefore, modelled as normally distributed and estimated as a linear combination of the predictors via an identity link function.

  5. Descriptive statistics are supplied as supplementary material.

  6. There was some evidence that overall, and in some criteria in particular, criteria were more likely to be considered met for female sex/gender conditions. Due to the categorical treatment of the probability that criteria were met, there was considerable uncertainty surrounding this effect.

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Autism SA for their role in recruitment and Professor Anna Chur-Hansen for her support and valuable insights into qualitative analyses. This paper has been prepared from a doctoral dissertation (of the first author) and we acknowledge the support of an Australian Government Training Program Scholarship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JT, RY, and NW developed the study concept and design. JT collected the data and NW and JT analysed the data. JT drafted the paper, and RY and NW provided critical revisions. All authors approved the final version of the paper for submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robyn L. Young.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 98 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsirgiotis, J.M., Young, R.L. & Weber, N. A Mixed-Methods Investigation of Diagnostician Sex/Gender-Bias and Challenges in Assessing Females for Autism Spectrum Disorder. J Autism Dev Disord 52, 4474–4489 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-05300-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-05300-5

Keywords

Navigation